Addiction 101

Addictions are rewarding in the judgment of the addicted person, when he or she is engaging in the addictive behaviour. Addicts will pursue their addiction even when they know, or should know, that their addiction is harmful to physical health, economic potential, social status, and to the survival of supportive, trusting, and intimate relationships. Some addictions alter perception and judgment, and all addictions seem to offer such powerful rewards that the disadvantages and side-effects are disregarded. Psychologists have run a variety of interesting and cruel experiments to see exactly what harm rats and monkeys will endure for different rewards. These studies tend to reveal what kinds of sensory and psychological experiences are inherently attractive to mammals and primates and to provide insights into the psychology of value, but they don’t even begin to measure the harm that human beings can endure and inflict under the influence of addictions.

Continue reading “Addiction 101”

Freedom in the American Dream

An interesting story, courtesy of the BBC World News Web service about a survey of American teens. One of the findings is that American teens tend to be authoritarian in defence of patriotic values. They tend to think the First Amendment is too liberal and promotes anti-American values. The group responsible for the survey has its own web site with a page devoted to the survey.

Continue reading “Freedom in the American Dream”

Brezhnev of the Vatican

Some European countries (England) have laws that curtail freedom of speech to protect religious groups from criticism. There is a BBC an article that a Polish Court convicted a prominent journalist of insulting a foreign head of state. He compared the Pope to Brezhnev. I haven’t been able to get the offensive text. He may have meant that the Pope is isolated and dependent on the Vatican bureaucacy and a few personal assistants, and losing touch. That argument has some merit.
The head of State was the Pope who is the head of state of the Vatican City, which is a separate state under International Law. Poland doesn’t seem to have laws that specifically protect the Catholic Church and other religious groups from hate speech or other lesser forms of criticism. However I am not sure how those laws might apply to criticism of the Pope or his performance in the Vatican.

Tsunami Preachers – Atheist

Richard Dawkins, the grand ayatollah of English atheism, has written a couple of letters to the Guardian which interpret the Indian ocean tsunami disaster around his personal value system. While he is a more presentable salesman of values than the homophobic pastor of the Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka, Kansas, he is emotionally vested in his own beliefs, illogical about the lessons of the disaster, and ruthlessly determined to build his story on the bodies of the dead.

Continue reading “Tsunami Preachers – Atheist”

Swedish Preacher

My previous post, devoted to the Westboro Baptist Church’s bizarre interpretation of the Indian ocean disaster, refers to a case in Sweden in which a Pentecostal Minister was charged with the criminal offence of hate speech against gays and lesbians for a sermon preached in his own church. I had trouble getting a clear factual story on the Web, because most of the Web sites that mention it are either devoted to the interests of religious groups, or devoted to gay pride issues. Each side has its own stories and both contain mistakes and legal inaccuracies. The coverage in the online edition of Christianity Today was clear and informative. It also played a minor part in a story about the cultural war between religion and liberalism in Europe in Time Magazine.

Continue reading “Swedish Preacher”