After the sexual revolution

A little more light reading. The piece is by Christine Rosen writing at the Claremont Institute’s online Review of Books “What (Most) Women Want“, a book review of “Taking Sex Differences Seriously” by Steven E. Rhoads.
A web piece on a related topic, from The Edge, with streaming media, slides, or text, a nature-nurture debate about women in the sciences in University faculties. The debaters are Steven Pinker and and Elizabeth Spelke.


One response to “After the sexual revolution”

  1. Garth Danielson Avatar
    Garth Danielson

    The article by Rosen illustrates a problem I have with lots of feminists, and others who have a “one-view” look at the world. Other people can have an opinion that can be as right for them, based on what they believe in. This is why i have so much of a problem with the Christian fundmentalist types.
    Hell, just the differences in the way men and women look at sex and are designed to function can create a huge rift in a relationship. People have died over drapes. I don’t have any real information but I bet I am not making it up, the law of averages is just to great here. It’s always been a wonder that so many people manage to stay married so long, they must operate at a much lower emotional level than I do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *